Blog: Celebrate or commiserate for IWD23?
8th March 2023
by Shelagh Young, Engagement Lead, David Hume Institute
Whatever happened to celebrating International Women’s Day?
Back in the day my heart was stirred by inspiring visions of a better future. Today the news is filled with the inescapable truth that far too many women are being left behind by a struggling economy and policies which ignore, and sometimes increase, many of the profound inequalities which first sparked the women’s movement into life.
Take today’s PMQ session. When asked about action to close the gender pension gap Prime Minister Sunak responded by saying auto-enrolment had helped millions of women. It has but there was no mention of the 1 in 6 women who are currently ineligible to join due to low earnings. Delve a bit deeper and the Government’s own annual review of the scheme makes it clear that reducing the threshold for auto-enrolment was not considered useful for those for whom it “could make little or no economic sense to save into a pension” stating that it would “divert income away from their day to day needs.”
If people can’t meet their day to day needs now without skimping on pension contributions, who will meet those needs in old age? This isn’t a problem solved easily even for those women who can work more hours or get a better paid job.
Image credit: Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya free from Unsplash 08.03.2023.
As the consultancy PwC revealed this week, an 18 year old woman entering paid work today will remain permanently poorer than her male peers as she won't see gender pay parity in her working lifetime.
They also reported that childcare costs are so exorbitant that they are driving women out of the paid workforce.
Meanwhile the Joseph Rowntree Foundation pitched in with a cautionary tale about the numbers priced out of home ownership whose income in retirement will also need to cover the rent.
This gives a particularly sharp edge to this week’s advice from Scottish Widows which, as is so often the case, looks to individual women not society in general to solve a problem they did not cause. According to their report, in order to close the average £123,000 difference between men’s and women’s pension savings, young women in their 20s should save really hard before gender discrimination, motherhood and other caring responsibilities take their toll.
Small wonder then that when we surveyed Scotland’s population for our most recent quarterly Understanding Scotland report, women were far gloomier than men when it came to their personal finances.
Nearly half of women expected to see their financial position worsen over the next 12 months and 29% had lost sleep due to anxiety over personal finances, compared with only 19% of men. Women were also more likely than men to have skipped meals, reduced portion sizes and used less energy at home to save money. Unfortunately, this probably wasn’t about saving for the future. 45% of women had taken money out of savings and the same proportion had saved less than normal in order to cover current costs. Unsurprisingly, men lagged behind in this depressing race to the bottom by at least 5 to 10 percentage points in almost every domain.
Most shocking of all is that although half of men said they were confident they could cover an unexpected bill of £100 only 37% of women felt they could. This brings us neatly to the gender gap in paid working hours. If your washing machine breaks down there is still more likelihood of the woman in a household being responsible for sorting it out. Being poor keeps you busy but we know what sort of busy leads to better pay and it isn’t the domestic sort.
Which brings us back to needing something to celebrate. When it comes to achieving equal pay and economic growth which respects both planetary limits and the principles of social justice, we clearly have a gender problem and it isn’t just for women to solve.
Ends
